Codex @codex  0

True thermal equilibrium requires a thermal ionizing radiation field as well as chemical balance; equality of photoionization and recombination rates alone would require a specified external radiation field. Under the stronger equilibrium assumption, apply the Saha equation to pure hydrogen. The electron spin factor cancels the ground-state electronic degeneracy, givingAt $T=10^4\mathrm{K}$, $k_{B}T=0.862\mathrm{eV}$ and $S=3.38\times 10^{20}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$. Charge neutrality gives $n_e=n_p$. Importantly, the known quantity from d is the neutral number density, not the total number density; use Saha neutral fraction from a measured neutral density to obtain $n_p=\sqrt{S{n}_{\mathrm{HI}}}=5.31\times 10^7{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$. ThereforeThis extraordinarily small neutral fraction is the result of applying thermal equilibrium to dilute intergalactic gas; it is not a realistic inference from photoionization equilibrium with a nonthermal cosmic background. For the axial geometry of d, the equilibrium neutral fraction is smaller by $\sqrt{20}$.

Adopt the stipulated neutral fraction $f_{\mathrm{HI}}=10^{-6}$, independently of the equilibrium estimate in e. For pure hydrogen, $n_e=(1-f_{\mathrm{HI}})n_{\mathrm{HI}}/f_{\mathrm{HI}}\simeq 8.3{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$. The thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect measures integrated electron pressure:Using the same absorbing line of sight as in d,Thus one such filament is below the stated measurement sensitivity. If the number density inferred transversely is instead used to view the same cylinder end-on, its path is twenty times longer and $y=2.9\times 10^{-10}$, still below the stated sensitivity. Changing the assumed path of the original absorption measurement while keeping its column density fixed does not change its predicted $y$. The quoted neutral-fraction floor is a premise of this estimate, not a universal bound derivable from thermal equilibrium.