The formal language is a context-free language. A context-free grammar with start nonterminal symbol is
The production rule for nests one on the left and one on the right on each recursive use, so generates exactly for . Similarly, generates exactly for . The start production rule concatenates these words, yielding
Conversely, every choice of nonnegative integers is achieved by using the recursive production rules exactly times before their epsilon productions. Hence this context-free grammar generates precisely the required formal language, including all cases where either count is zero.
The formal language is not a context-free language. Suppose otherwise, and let be a pumping length from the pumping lemma for context-free languages. Choose
This word belongs to the formal language, since its middle exponent is the product of the two outer exponents. The pumping lemma for context-free languages would give
with in the formal language for every integer .
Let be the respective numbers of symbols in the two pumped pieces together. The window cannot contain both an and a : it would have to contain the entire middle block of length , plus at least those two outer symbols, exceeding . Hence
Pump once extra, taking . The resulting symbol counts are , , and . A necessary condition for membership, regardless of whether the block order survives, is
where was used.
If , then , contradicting that equality. If , then
again contradicting it. Thus every permissible decomposition fails at . This contradicts the pumping lemma for context-free languages and proves the claim. The obstruction is the multiplicative block-count language: a bounded local change cannot preserve the product constraint.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.