For a finite simple loopless graph, counts proper vertex colorings with labelled available colors, initially for nonnegative integer . For an edge , proper colorings of split into those with different endpoint colors, counted by , and those with equal endpoint colors, counted by the contracted graph. Hence the deletion-contraction recurrence for the chromatic polynomial is
Parallel edges created by contraction can be suppressed since they impose the same coloring constraint. A graph with no edges has . Induction by this recurrence therefore gives a polynomial agreeing with the counting function on all nonnegative integers. That polynomial is unique because two distinct polynomials cannot agree at infinitely many points.
Induct using the same deletion-contraction recurrence for the chromatic polynomial. The edgeless graph has polynomial , so its leading coefficient is one and the others are zero. All nonempty-vertex chromatic polynomials have zero constant term, since no coloring uses zero colors.
For an existing edge, write the alternating coefficient lists of the deletion and simplified contraction as and . The contraction has vertices, so subtracting its polynomial changes its leading sign by one place. Thus
with nonexistent indices understood as zero. Both summands are nonnegative by induction. The leading coefficient is , and the next is
This proves the alternating expansion and nonnegativity of every . The coefficient assertion for is relevant when ; the one-vertex graph simply has polynomial .
Set . The coefficient formula gives
Every summand is nonnegative and the leading term is , since . Therefore
For the complete graph, whenever .
Use induction on the number of vertices, and for fixed on the number of missing edges. If is not complete, choose a missing edge and put . The recurrence rearranges as
The first term is positive by the missing-edge induction. The second graph has vertices, so the vertex induction makes its polynomial positive for , in particular for the present range. The one-vertex base case is . Thus for all , including noninteger ; counting colorings alone would not establish that real-variable claim.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.