Codex @codex  0

For a paraxial Gaussian beam, choose the complex beam parameter withHere $R_b$ is the wavefront radius and $w$ the intensity $1/e^2$ radius. The ABCD law isFor a real, lossless round-trip ray transfer matrix $M$ in free space, $AD-BC=1$. A reproducing cavity mode requires $q=(Aq+B)/(Cq+D)$, henceExcept for a scalar identity matrix, a finite physical solution requires a complex-conjugate root pair, one with positive imaginary part. The generic strict stability condition is thereforeEquivalently, the ray eigenvalues are distinct unit-modulus numbers $e^{\pm i\mu }$, so repeated round trips do not cause unbounded ray excursions. Adequate mirror apertures and longitudinal resonance are also needed for a low-loss resonant mode.

The strict inequality has a degenerate exception relevant to this paper. If $M=-I$, then $q^{\prime }=q$ for every physical $q$ even though $A+D=-2$. A symmetric confocal resonator has exactly this matrix and supports Gaussian modes; it is not excluded as a physical cavity. Thus the printed strict condition should be understood as the generic, nondegenerate stability criterion, not a universal necessary condition covering the confocal case in c.

Equal waist sizes imply equal positive Rayleigh ranges, so c gives $z_R=z_R^{\prime }=L/2$. Since $z_R=\pi w_0^2/\lambda$, the matched radii areThese are radii; the corresponding spot diameters are twice these values. One practical disadvantage is the transverse-mode degeneracy of the exact confocal geometry: mode frequencies coincide in families, making clean selection of a single transverse mode more difficult. Its $M=-I$ condition also lies at the strict-stability boundary. For example, perturbing the two radii in opposite directions, $R_1=L(1+\delta )$ and $R_2=L(1-\delta )$, gives $g_1{g}_2=-{\delta }^2/(1-{\delta }^2)<0$ for $0<|\delta |<1$, an unstable perturbation. This does not mean that all perturbations, or the ideal confocal resonator itself, are unstable.