Let bound all and put . ThenThe geometric series converges, so the comparison test for series proves absolute convergence of . This is the bounded power-series terms force interior absolute convergence principle.
Define the radius of convergence byallowing and . If , the supremum supplies a point of convergence with ; convergence makes its terms bounded, so the argument above gives absolute convergence at . If , convergence is impossible by definition. At , no general conclusion follows. Thus the convergence region has a circular interior centered at zero, with boundary behavior depending on the power series.
For ,If , choose strictly between that limit and . Eventually , proving absolute convergence by the geometric series comparison. If , choose below the limit; eventually , so the terms do not tend to zero and the series diverges. The point is harmless. This proves the root test in the needed case and gives
All three examples below have radius of convergence one, because the th roots of their coefficient moduli tend to one.
For convergence everywhere on the boundary, take . On it converges absolutely: for , , whose sum telescopes to a finite value.
For divergence everywhere on the boundary, take . If , every term has modulus one, so the term test for divergence applies.
For mixed boundary behavior, take . At it is the divergent harmonic series; each successive dyadic block contributes at least . At every other point , summation by parts proves convergence. Indeed put , so the finite geometric series gives . ThenThus the partial sums form a Cauchy sequence and converge. This derives the relevant Dirichlet test rather than only naming it.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.