Let be a small diagram in a category. Since is a complete category, choose at each a categorical limit
For , the arrows form a cone over a diagram at , because the diagram arrows are natural transformations. There is therefore a unique arrow with
The universal property immediately gives and : both sides have the same composites with every limit projection. Thus is a functor, and the displayed equations make the natural transformations.
Given any categorical cone in the functor category, its components induce unique . For , compare and after each ; naturality of makes their composites equal. Hence is a natural transformation, and uniqueness is componentwise. This proves that is a categorical limit in .
The functor category is complete, and every evaluation functor preserves limits, since evaluating the constructed limit at gives exactly the chosen limit in . This is the pointwise limits in a functor category construction; it also covers the empty diagram and its terminal object.
Let be a natural transformation of categorical presheaves. If every is a surjective function, and satisfy , then at every . Surjectivity gives for all , hence . Thus is an epimorphism.
Conversely suppose is outside the image of some . Construct the pushout witness for failure of pointwise surjectivity explicitly: at each take
Restrictions send to ; naturality of ensures that every generating identification is respected. Thus is a categorical presheaf, and the two inclusions are natural transformations with .
All identifications concern the same element in its two copies, so an element outside the image is never identified with its other copy. Consequently , proving is not an epimorphism. Therefore
This is the pointwise epimorphism in a functor category criterion. It requires neither a componentwise choice of preimages nor a natural section.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.