Apply Plünnecke's inequality with the summand set also equal to . There is a nonempty satisfying for every .
We need the Ruzsa triangle inequality in a form whose short proof also fixes the signs. For every , choose one representation . The map
is injective into : its difference recovers , then the fixed representation recovers . Therefore
Use and and the common set from the previous part:
Thus
The shared minimizing subset is important; applying separate growth estimates with unrelated subsets would not justify this bound.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.