Apply Plünnecke's inequality with the summand set also equal to . There is a nonempty satisfying for every .
We need the Ruzsa triangle inequality in a form whose short proof also fixes the signs. For every , choose one representation . The mapis injective into : its difference recovers , then the fixed representation recovers . ThereforeUse and and the common set from the previous part:ThusThe shared minimizing subset is important; applying separate growth estimates with unrelated subsets would not justify this bound.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.