Use and the unnormalized Fourier transform
We state the eighth-power convention explicitly. A bounded function is -quadratically uniform if
where means conjugation and every expectation is uniform. The expression is real and nonnegative. Applying Parseval identity on a finite group to the multiplicative derivatives gives the equivalent condition
This is the Derivative identity for the Gowers U3 norm. A set of density is quadratically uniform when its balanced subset indicator satisfies that condition, not when its unbalanced indicator does. Some definitions bound rather than its eighth power; that norm parameter is in the convention here. Quadratic uniformity controls three-dimensional additive cubes and four-term progression counts; small ordinary linear Fourier coefficients alone are not the same condition.
Define the normalized progression average
We first prove the needed four-term progression bound with torsion factors, valid for the arbitrary cyclic modulus in the question:
For the factor at slope zero, write , , and apply Cauchy-Schwarz to discard :
For concise bookkeeping put , the conjugate of the preceding derivative convention, and . Expanding the square with and setting gives . Another Cauchy-Schwarz, now in , discards and yields
Expand with , set , and apply Cauchy-Schwarz a third time to discard . The remaining -average is a full average over , so
Negating does not change the average. The nonnegative integrand depends only on and . Averaging over the subgroups and costs at most their indices and compared with unrestricted increments. The unrestricted expression is exactly , obtained by expanding the last squared average. Thus the bound is .
Reversing the progression handles slope three. To isolate slope one, eliminate slopes three, zero and two successively in the same calculation; the surviving increments have coefficients , so only the index is needed. Reversal handles slope two. This proves the minimum-over-factors bound, without assuming that or is invertible modulo .
If , the requested lower bound is zero and is immediate. Otherwise let . Telescoping the product of four copies of against the constant product gives four error terms, each with one factor and three factors bounded by one. Hence
In particular, choosing gives
These are ordered modular progression parameters , as requested; small-order differences and are included. A claim of distinct nontrivial progressions would need a separate subtraction and size condition.
Normalize the selected derivative correlations by
They satisfy , and the hypothesis gives . Thus . Choose phases of modulus one so that , with any choice if . Then
One Cauchy-Schwarz gives
Expand into pairs and group them by , . After translating , the derivative correlation is
The grouped coefficient is
Consequently , whose right-hand side is the real nonnegative expanded square. A second Cauchy-Schwarz yields
If counts the pairs in the displayed coefficient, then . Thus , the additive energy of a frequency graph . Equality of two pair differences is equivalent, by permuting the four labels, to equality of the two requested sums in each coordinate.
For every , Parseval identity on a finite group in normalized Fourier convention gives
There are shifts, so . Since , we conclude
This is precisely the number of ordered satisfying both and , all modulo . It proves squared derivative correlations force frequency-graph energy with the constant and exact equalities stated, rather than approximate frequency matching.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.