Write for truth. Let be the subobject classified by the monomorphism . Its classifier pullback gives . The left side is monic, so is monic as well: is subterminal.
Let be classified by . The pullback square for says that is also the pullback of along . Since is classified by , the composite therefore classifies . Pulling this subobject back along gives : for subterminal objects with , . Uniqueness of characteristic maps now gives . Combining with proves
To deduce the full identity, let classify . The pullback of along is . Indeed , and if , monicity of forces , giving the universal property. The classifier of that pullback is . But the subobject imposes both truth of the input and the subterminal condition , so its characteristic map is . The meet operation here is defined using only finite limits and the classifier. Thus . In particular , by the unit and idempotence laws for meet. Since is monic, , and henceThis proves the monic endomorphism of a subobject classifier property under exactly the stated finite-limit assumptions; no Boolean logic was used.
For the epic counterexample, use the covariant functor topos , with one arrow when . A classifier value at stage is an upward-closed set of future stages, so it is a threshold , or for the empty set. The transition from to sends to and fixes . DefineFor the transition to , both composites send finite to , so the maps are natural. Each component is surjective: threshold is the image of , and is its own image. Epimorphisms in a functor topos are objectwise surjective, so is epic. But , making it noninjective and not invertible. Thus the classifier has an epic endomorphism which is not an isomorphism, the shift epimorphism of the natural-number presheaf classifier.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.