Take at the base and assume gas leaves freely at the liquid surface, without being retained as foam. There is no new bubble production after filling. Neglecting the liquid velocity, gas-volume conservation is a scalar conservation lawAn impermeable base has no incoming bubbles. Thus a clear region develops below the uniform bubbly region. The clearing discontinuity satisfies the Rankine-Hugoniot condition, with states and :For the dilute regime , the characteristic speeds obey , so this is the admissible compressive shock. Before it reaches the surface,The remaining bubbles move upwards at and escape at the top. Averaging the void fraction over the entire cylindrical volume givesThis bubble clearing in a cylindrical vessel describes bubbles in the liquid, not a hypothetical retained gas layer above it. A closed surface or long-lived foam would require a different upper boundary condition.
The radius law integrates to , so the cross-sectional area is . Conserving gas volume in a horizontal slice yieldsor the kinematic bubble transport in an exponentially narrowing vessel equationThe geometrical term increases the concentration as a given gas flux enters a smaller area. On concentration characteristic curves,Put . A characteristic starting at with hasThe first formula follows by integrating ; inserting it into gives the second. For initially uniform , the uninterrupted bubbly region remains spatially uniform, with this time-dependent concentration. These characteristic curves carry concentration information; they are not individual bubble trajectories, whose speed is .
Use the uniformly filled narrowing vessel of the preceding part. A bubble within its uniform bubbly region seesIts material rise speed is , not the concentration-characteristic speed. Integrating from givesThe cylindrical limit is , as required. The bottom clearing front follows this same position by the local Rankine-Hugoniot condition. In the narrowing vessel the formula applies until the bubble leaves at , or a boundary interaction changes the uniform state. Its formal large-time limit is , while . Crowding and liquid backflow invalidate the assumed dilute, negligible-liquid-velocity closure before this limit is a reliable prediction of a real tankard.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.