If , all its localizations are zero. Conversely, take . Its annihilator is a proper ideal, so it is contained in a maximal ideal , which is prime. The zero criterion for module localization says that in only if some satisfies . This would put , a contradiction. Therefore , provingIn fact maximal ideals suffice, and neither finite generation nor Noetherianity is needed for this implication.
Set . The natural map is onto. Its kernel is the image of : a fraction maps to zero precisely when for some . If , then . This proves the localized cokernel identity directly:Thus is a surjection for every exactly when for every . Part (i) makes this equivalent to , or to being a surjection. Hence surjectivity is detected at all prime localizations, and again maximal ideals alone would suffice.
Let . If is a prime ideal, then . Its extension isIt is proper: would give for some , and hence , impossible because . If a product lies in , clearing a denominator gives for some . Primeness and imply or . Thus is prime. Its contraction is , since implies for some , forcing .
Conversely, contract a prime ideal of to . This is a prime ideal of . It contains no element of , since such an element becomes a unit and cannot belong to the proper ideal . Hence . Also exactly when , because is a unit, so . These extension and contraction operations are inverse, giving the prime ideal correspondence for localization:
An associated prime of a module is an annihilator of a nonzero element. Suppose is prime and . Then in : a denominator killing would belong to . MoreoverIndeed, if , some has , so ; primeness and imply . The reverse containment is immediate. This proves one inclusion in the localization of associated primes formula.
For the other, let be an associated prime of and contract it to . By part (iii), is prime, and . Since is invertible, is also the annihilator of . The Noetherian ring hypothesis makes finitely generated. For each , the equality supplies with . Put , taking for the zero ideal. Then annihilates , while because is a unit and .
If , then annihilates , so . Therefore , and . We concludeThe single common denominator is the key point: one must turn a localized annihilator into the annihilator of one actual nonzero element of , not merely assert that annihilators commute with localization.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.