OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2004 / iii / Paper 61 / 1 / b

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 61 1
2026-10-03  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
  • Table of contents
    • Solution b

Solution

 0  0
b
Put w(k)=−i(k3+k) and define the spectral flux
X(x,t,k)=qxx​+ikqx​−(k2+1)q.​
(1)
Writing E=e−ikx+w(k)t, division of the proposed divergence form by E gives qt​+wq+Xx​−ikX. Direct differentiation yields
Xx​−ikX=qxxx​−qx​+i(k3+k)q.
(2)
The last term cancels wq, so the divergence form is exactly the normalized partial differential equation. This calculation fixes both the sign of the dispersion relation and the sign of the boundary flux used below.

 Ancestors (10)

  1. 1
  2. Paper 61
  3. iii
  4. 2004
  5. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  6. Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  7. Course of the University of Cambridge
  8. University of Cambridge
  9. List of universities
  10.  Home

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook