Let the three orbit points be . Up to reflection of the interval, their images are . Set and . Continuity and the intermediate value theorem imply the covering relationsWe first prove the needed interval-covering principle using the permitted pullback fact. If a cyclic list of closed intervals obeys , pull back successively from the end to obtain a closed interval with and . Since , the intermediate value theorem gives a fixed point of in : choose preimages of the two endpoints of , which give opposite weak signs of , irrespective of their order. This point realizes the cyclic itinerary.
For , use the word . It obeys the covering relations and therefore yields a point with period dividing . A point away from the shared endpoint has an unambiguous itinerary, and this word has exactly one per cycle; it cannot be a repetition of a shorter word. Its least period is consequently . If an orbit touches , it is the original three-cycle. That realizes the case itself. It cannot realize any of the other words: for not divisible by three it is not fixed by , and for a multiple of three larger than three it visits more than once, contradicting the itinerary. Thus the construction works for every . For , and the same fixed-point argument gives a fixed point. This proves period three implies all periods: there is an orbit of every positive least period.
For the two five-cycles forced by a three-cycle, use the two cyclic words and . Both are admissible. Their points cannot be endpoints from the three-cycle, and because five is prime and the words use both intervals, each has least period five. Their itineraries have respectively one and two visits to the interior of ; cyclically shifting the starting point cannot change this count. Hence they give at least two distinct period-five orbits.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.