As printed in the original PDF, this claim is false for . The displayed frequency is one, so the function already belongs to the space of trigonometric polynomials of degree at most . Its best approximation is then the function itself, with zero error; for example, gives a zero-approximant error instead. For , zero is indeed the best constant approximation. Thus the literal answer is
The natural intended version has frequency . Set and . The sign function is integrable and satisfies , so its mean is zero. Part (b) makes orthogonal to every degree-at-most- trigonometric polynomial. Part (a), with , now proves
The error is for the unnormalized integral over a period.
The best approximant is unique. If the amplitude is nonzero and another continuous trigonometric polynomial has the same optimal error, equality in part (a)'s pointwise inequality holds almost everywhere. Near each zero of , the function changes sign; if did not vanish at that zero, continuity would force an interval on one side where has the wrong sign, making the integral inequality strict. Thus vanishes at all distinct zeros of . A nonzero trigonometric polynomial of degree at most has at most zeros in one period, since multiplication by turns it into a polynomial in of degree at most . Hence . Zero amplitude is immediate. The same reasoning proves the literal frequency-one assertion when , while retaining the counterexample for larger .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.