Write the square as , with final and a discrete fibration. For , choose an object of the nonempty comma category . Lift uniquely to an arrowover , and tentatively put .
A morphism in this comma category is an arrow with . The composite is a lift of with codomain . Uniqueness of lifts gives , including equality of their source objects. Since the comma category is connected by zigzags, is independent of the choice. Thus is well defined and .
For , take . Lift into , obtaining . Composing with gives a lift of into , whose source must be . Hence . Set . Uniqueness of this lift makes the definition independent of the chosen comma object and proves and .
At , choose . Its lift is , so . For , is the unique lift of into , so . We have constructed the required functor with and .
If is another filler, must equal by unique lifting. Thus for every object. Its arrows are then forced by unique lifting into those objects. ThereforeThis proves the orthogonality of final functors and discrete fibrations.
For each , let , the collection of connected components, where connectedness means connection by a zigzag of arrows. Precomposition with gives a function . Identity and composition are inherited from precomposition.
Construct a category whose objects are pairs with . An arrow is an arrow satisfying . Composition is that of , and the component equation is preserved by composition. The projection is a discrete fibration: an arrow has precisely one lift into , namely the arrow from represented by .
For an object of , an object of is exactly a pair representing the component . Its morphisms are exactly the arrows in between such objects. Thus this comma category is the component itself, which is nonempty and connected. This proves that is a final functor, and henceThis is the final-discrete-fibration factorization. For small categories the collections are sets and this construction is the category of elements of the presheaf . For categories of a larger size, the construction is interpreted in the same chosen ambient size framework.
Suppose are two such factorizations, with final and discrete fibrations. Apply the unique diagonal construction to the square with left side , top , bottom and right side . It gives a unique functor such that and . Reversing the two factorizations gives with and .
Both and fill the square with left side , top , bottom and right side . Uniqueness from part (i) gives . Similarly . ThusIn particular the conclusion is a canonical isomorphism of intermediate categories, not just an unspecified equivalence.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.