For positive integer , the equivalence is the bounded invariant norm characterization of cusp forms. The three conditions below work together: meromorphicity and the bound remove interior poles; the transformation law produces a periodic local function at every modular cusp; the same bound makes that function tend to zero at the modular cusp. Conversely a cusp form has exponentially decaying Fourier expansions of a modular form, and finitely many compact core regions control its invariant norm everywhere. These implications are proved under the corresponding labelled items.
Without a positive-weight convention, weight zero is a genuine exception. The function satisfies all three printed conditions at for every congruence subgroup, but is not a cusp form. Indeed a weight-zero cusp form would descend to a holomorphic function on the compact curve and hence be constant, and vanishing at a modular cusp would make it zero. Thus the literal unrestricted claim needs the qualification .
If negative integer weights are included, both sides contain only the zero function. To check the bounded side, each modular cusp translate has at most power growth in , hence at most a power of . For a negative Laurent coefficient of order , Cauchy's coefficient estimate bounds its absolute value by , so there is no negative coefficient and every modular cusp is holomorphic. If such a nonzero negative-weight form existed, the product of its slash translates over would be a nonzero holomorphic level-one modular form of negative weight. Right multiplication permutes the translates, and all modular cusp factors are bounded, so that product really is a level-one form. Its existence contradicts the valence formula. This also excludes negative-weight modular cusp forms. The nonzero counterexample is specifically weight zero.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.