Count each unordered -vertex set once. For each such set , let be its clique indicator in the binomial random graph. All required edges are independent, so
The Markov inequality, or first moment method, gives
Consequently
This argument works even if varies. The binomial coefficient shows that cliques are counted as vertex sets, not as their different ordered listings.
Expand , where the sum is over ordered pairs of -sets. If , the two cliques together require different edges: precisely the edges within the overlap are counted twice. Therefore
There are choices of , then ways to choose the overlap and ways to choose the remaining vertices of . It follows that
A binomial coefficient is zero when its lower argument is outside its possible range. The term includes and equals , as it should.
Now take the usual fixed- interpretation of the appearance assertion. For , deterministically. For fixed , the assumption gives
since . Eventually . Subtracting in the second-moment formula, and using the identity that the overlap counts sum to the total number of ordered pairs, gives the overlap formula for the variance of a clique count:
Overlaps of zero or one vertex have no shared edge and hence independent indicators, so their contributions vanish. For fixed , the combinatorial coefficient in the -th summand is . Moreover, because and ,
There are only finitely many terms. Thus . The Chebyshev inequality then gives
proving the fixed-size clique appearance threshold:
The fixed-size condition cannot simply be dropped. For and ,
However the complement graph has a binomial number of missing edges with mean asymptotic to and variance at most that mean. By the Chebyshev inequality, . Conditional on , choose two distinct missing edges uniformly; their endpoints are disjoint except with probability
Thus with probability tending to one the complement has two disjoint edges. Deleting one vertex cannot remove both, so no -clique exists. In this example , despite . This is growing clique size can invalidate a first-moment appearance criterion; the exact second-moment identity remains valid for growing , but the stated conclusion needs the conventional fixed- quantifier.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.