By differentiability implies continuity, . Add and subtract in the difference quotient:
The two quotient limits exist by the given differentiability. Taking the limit and using continuity yields the product rule:
Thus the product is differentiable at the specified point; differentiability elsewhere is not needed.
At zero, and
by continuity of at zero. Thus is always differentiable there, with , regardless of whether exists.
At , if is differentiable, the product rule applied to proves that is differentiable. Conversely, if is differentiable at , the function is differentiable on a neighborhood of . Apply the product rule to on that neighborhood. This proves the differentiability restored by a quadratic zero equivalence:
At a nonzero differentiability point, .
For the necessity in the differentiability of the square of a continuous function, suppose is differentiable at . If , continuity makes nonzero for small , and
Hence is differentiable at , giving alternative (i).
If , is a minimum because . The right difference quotients of are nonnegative and the left ones are nonpositive; since their common limit exists, it must be zero. Thus , and
Taking square roots of this nonnegative expression shows , giving alternative (ii). The two labelled parts below establish sufficiency of the respective alternatives. Together they prove the full stated equivalence, including the zero of where squaring can remove a failure of differentiability.
If is differentiable at , the product rule applied to gives
This proves sufficiency of the first alternative. No additional growth condition is required; if , the derivative of the square is zero.
Suppose and . Then
Therefore
This proves sufficiency of the second alternative even if itself is not differentiable at . For example, is continuous and not differentiable at zero, while is differentiable there with derivative zero.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.