More generally let be a homotopy inverse of and one of . Then satisfies , and satisfies . The first argument applies. Hence the separate one-sided hypotheses imply that is a homotopy equivalence, as expressed by separate homotopy inverses combine into a homotopy equivalence.
Take a homotopy equivalence with inverse , and universal covering maps . Since the covering spaces are simply connected, the path lifting theorem constructs lifts of and of , after specifying one value in the appropriate fiber. Explicitly, define the lift at a point by lifting the image of a path from the chosen base point; independence from the path follows from simple connectedness and homotopy lifting.
Lift a homotopy starting at . The homotopy lifting theorem for a covering map makes its endpoint a map with . Such a lift of the identity is a deck transformation and is a homeomorphism: lift the identity again with the base point image reversed, and uniqueness of path lifts makes the two compositions identities. Likewise for a deck transformation of .
Thus both compositions are homotopy equivalences, even though the lifted homotopies need not end at the particular identity lift. Part (i) then provesKeeping the possible deck transformations is essential when the original homotopies do not fix base points.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.