Write . An idempotent is an element with ; it is central idempotent when it commutes with every element of the ring. In a commutative ring centrality is automatic. Two idempotents are orthogonal idempotents if . A nonzero primitive central idempotent cannot be expressed as the sum of two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents; this is primitivity in , not necessarily primitivity in .
A block of a group algebra is an indecomposable two-sided direct-summand ideal of , equivalently an ideal with a primitive central idempotent. Here is the equivalence. If as two-sided ideals, then . Write with . Multiplication by this equality shows that is the identity of , that is the identity of , and that are orthogonal central idempotents. Conversely a central idempotent gives . Splitting the ideal further is therefore equivalent to splitting its central idempotent further.
For uniqueness, suppose are decompositions into primitive central idempotents. For each ,
is an orthogonal central-idempotent decomposition. Exactly one summand is nonzero, and that summand equals . Applying the same reasoning to the corresponding gives . Thus the blocks, and their identities, are unique up to ordering. Existence in the paper's coefficient rings follows from finite-dimensionality over , and over from completeness and idempotent lifting of the decomposition modulo its maximal ideal.
Over , a principal indecomposable module is an indecomposable summand of the regular left module , equivalently for a primitive idempotent of . Put , the Jacobson radical. The head of a module is nonzero and semisimple. It is simple: projectivity gives a surjection
whose kernel consists of maps into and is nilpotent, since a product of such maps sends into . If the head of a module split, a nontrivial projection on it would lift by idempotent lifting to a nontrivial projection on , contradicting indecomposability. Every maximal submodule contains , since annihilates simple modules. The simplicity of the head of a module now proves is the unique maximal submodule, and is its head of a module's projective cover.
Choose the simple modules , with corresponding projective covers . Our convention for the Cartan matrix of a group algebra is
where brackets denote the multiplicity in a composition series.
For the final two unheaded requests, retain the additional hypothesis . Choose a central subgroup of of order . Every element of centralizes , and so does every element of ; hence . Set , so is central and , and .
To lift a central idempotent of this quotient, first lift it as an idempotent by idempotent refinement theorem. Since is central, . Multiplying a representation on the left and right by gives
The other off-diagonal corner vanishes likewise, so is central. Two central lifts of the same idempotent coincide: their mismatched products and are idempotents in the nilpotent kernel and therefore zero. Primitivity is preserved because orthogonal idempotent decompositions lift. Thus the central -quotient gives a bijection of block idempotents.
The quotient still satisfies the required hypothesis for , because the image of centralizes . Induction on therefore proves bijects the block idempotents of and . The centrality argument is essential: a general nilpotent algebra quotient need not give a bijection of central block idempotents.
For the Cartan matrix of a group algebra, every projective -module is free over : is free over , a projective -module is a summand of a finite free -module, and finite projectives over the local ring are free. If is a principal indecomposable module, is a principal indecomposable module over : an idempotent splitting of its endomorphism ring would lift and split . The quotients of its filtration
are all isomorphic to as -modules, by multiplication by the corresponding power of . All simple modules are annihilated by the nilpotent ideal . Hence , with the natural indexing of simple modules, and . Iterating over gives
This is blocks and Cartan matrices under central p-quotients. The extra hypothesis is still in force: for example in characteristic three does not satisfy it, and its Group algebra Cartan matrix is rather than .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.