The angles and are cyclic. Their conjugate momentum components are and , so both are conserved; consequently is constant. With ,Eliminating the cyclic velocities gives the nutation effective potentialapart from the constant axial spin energy. ThusThe endpoint is excluded for these nonzero conserved momenta: the effective potential diverges there. The apparent Euler-angle singularity at is interpreted by its smooth small-tilt limit.
Put . There is no nonzero equilibrium angle because . The upright angle is stable: its linearized equation is . HenceThese are small nutational oscillations of the rapidly spinning top. No downward equilibrium belongs to the momentum level under consideration.
For , the upright angle has and is unstable. There is one nonzero equilibrium in ,Differentiate the right side of the nutation equation at this angle. Since the bracket vanishes there, the derivative is . Therefore it is stable, withThis equilibrium represents steady precession, not a top with all Euler angles stationary. The equality case is excluded by the two cases in the question and requires a nonlinear marginal analysis.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.