The angles and are cyclic. Their conjugate momentum components are and , so both are conserved; consequently is constant. With ,
Eliminating the cyclic velocities gives the nutation effective potential
apart from the constant axial spin energy. Thus
The endpoint is excluded for these nonzero conserved momenta: the effective potential diverges there. The apparent Euler-angle singularity at is interpreted by its smooth small-tilt limit.
Put . There is no nonzero equilibrium angle because . The upright angle is stable: its linearized equation is . Hence
These are small nutational oscillations of the rapidly spinning top. No downward equilibrium belongs to the momentum level under consideration.
For , the upright angle has and is unstable. There is one nonzero equilibrium in ,
Differentiate the right side of the nutation equation at this angle. Since the bracket vanishes there, the derivative is . Therefore it is stable, with
This equilibrium represents steady precession, not a top with all Euler angles stationary. The equality case is excluded by the two cases in the question and requires a nonlinear marginal analysis.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.