For a compact space , the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem says that a family is relatively compact in the supremum norm if and only if it is pointwise bounded and equicontinuous. In the usual formulation is compact Hausdorff; the elementary argument below also works for any compact for real-valued continuous functions.
Pointwise bounded means for every . Equicontinuity means that for every and there is a neighborhood of such that for every and . Relative compactness means compactness of the closure in , where . This is a complete metric vector space, since uniform limits of continuous functions are continuous. Equivalently, every sequence in the family has a uniformly convergent subsequence, with limit in , though not necessarily in the original family.
Assume first that is compact in the supremum norm. A finite norm-net shows that the norms of its members are bounded, so pointwise boundedness follows. Given and , choose a finite -net in the closure. Their continuity gives a common neighborhood of where for every . For any , choose with ; the triangle inequality then gives . Thus the family is equicontinuous.
Conversely, suppose pointwise boundedness and equicontinuity. For a prescribed , choose neighborhoods where every varies from by less than . Compactness supplies a finite subcover . Pointwise boundedness makes the set of vectors bounded in . Partition a bounding box into finitely many boxes of coordinate diameter less than , and choose one function from each occupied box. If belong to the same box and , thenThe chosen functions are therefore a finite -net in the supremum norm. Thus is totally bounded. Its closure is complete and totally bounded, hence compact. To recall the last metric-space fact, successively selecting subsequences in balls of radii produces a Cauchy diagonal subsequence from every sequence; completeness supplies its limit. This proves both directions of the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem.
Set . These are nonnegative continuous functions, decrease pointwise, and converge pointwise to zero. For , the open sets increase and cover . A finite subcover exists by compactness; because the sets are increasing, one already covers . Hence for every and every , and . Therefore . This is Dini's theorem; continuity of the limit is essential to the openness used in the proof.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.