For disjoint nonempty vertex sets , define their edge density of a bipartite graph by . They form an -regular pair of vertex sets if every , with , satisfies .
The Szemerédi regularity lemma asserts that, given and a positive integer , there are such that every graph on vertices has a set partition withand at most irregular ordered pairs with .
Assume , which suffices since a smaller regularity parameter gives the claim for a larger one. Treat the exceptional vertices as singleton cells in the full partition , and use equitable regularity energyHere the adjacency indicator function defines density even for diagonal cells. Clearly . If refines , weighted averaging of densities gives the refinement variance identity for regularity energyTo verify it, expand each square and use .
For every irregular ordered pair of nonexceptional cells, choose witnesses of relative sizes at least and density discrepancy greater than . Split each along all witnesses involving it; symmetry allows at most one witness for each other cell, hence at most atoms in each . In the witness rectangle, the weighted Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the variance identity contributes more than .
If more than pairs are irregular and the equal cell size is , the energy increase is greater thanRestore equal cell sizes by cutting each witness atom into pieces of size , with leftover vertices added to as singleton cells. This operation is a further refinement, so the energy does not decrease. There are at most atoms, and fewer than leftover vertices in each, giving at most new exceptional vertices.
Here is a uniform bound ensuring that the iteration is legitimate. Put and chooseStart with equal classes and fewer than exceptional vertices. Taking makes the initial exception at most . At every refinement the number of nonexceptional cells does not decrease: each old cell loses at most vertices and is cut into pieces of size at most . Thus each of the at most rounds adds at most exceptional vertices.
When , the new cell count is at mostusing . Define and , and take . Choosing ensures at every stage. All rounds are therefore defined, with cell count between and and exceptional size at most .
If the lemma still failed after refinements, the energy would have increased by more than , impossible because it lies in . Hence some stage has the required regular pairs. This completes the energy-increment proof of Szemerédi regularity, including the equal-size and exceptional-set conditions.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.