A useful version is the strong form of Hensel lemma. Let be complete for a Non-Archimedean absolute value, let , and suppose satisfies
Then there is a unique root in the ball , and .
Put and . Starting with , apply Newton iteration over a valued field . Taylor expansion over the valuation ring gives
for integral . Inductively and . Indeed the Newton increment has size at most , so the derivative size is unchanged, and the new function value is bounded by the square of the increment. The increments tend to zero, and the ultrametric inequality makes the sequence Cauchy. Completeness supplies a root with the stated distance bound.
If are distinct points of the ball, their divided difference is plus a term of size at most , so is nonzero. Two roots in that ball are impossible. This proves the stated Hensel lemma. In particular a simple root modulo the maximal ideal lifts uniquely to a root in its residue class.
For , the even residue class contains exactly one root, by the simple-root form of Hensel lemma at : and is a unit. For the odd classes use the strong form of Hensel lemma:
In both cases . Each gives exactly one root in . These two balls partition the odd integers, so there are no further roots.
For , reduction gives , whose sole root is . The derivative is always a unit modulo , so that root lifts uniquely. For , the only possible residue is zero. But if , then while has valuation one, so cannot vanish. The exact root counts are
The polynomial is an Eisenstein polynomial at , so it is irreducible and . Its polynomial discriminant is
One must remove the index at before using this as the field discriminant. Put . Direct reduction using gives
Thus is a ring finite over , so its elements are integral. Its basis has discriminant of elements of a number field . The discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice says , so only could divide the remaining index.
We use these standard different ideal facts: the norm of the different is the absolute field discriminant; its localization is the local different; an unramified prime has different exponent zero, and a tamely ramified prime of ramification index has different exponent . The Eisenstein polynomial at gives total ramification of degree three, which is tame because . Its contribution to is therefore two. This excludes a further index factor , proving and .
Since the index is prime to and , Dedekind factorization theorem applies at both primes. Modulo , , giving a single prime with residue degree one and ramification index three. Modulo ,
Thus has residue degree one and ramification index two; the other prime over is unramified. Both ramified primes are tame. No other prime ramifies because none divides . Consequently

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.