We work in the ambient theory ZFC for this question. Write , using the transitive closure convention that contains and all its membership descendants.
First construct a set containing exactly the intended objects. If is a countable set, apply well-founded induction to membership on this transitive set. If all members of have countable set-theoretic rank, thenIndeed is countable, and a countable union of countable sets is countable in ZFC. The induction therefore gives . The collectionis now a genuine set by the axiom schema of separation inside the cumulative hierarchy level , and it contains every hereditarily countable set. It is a transitive set, since implies .
If is a countable subset of , thenThe right side is countable, so . Thus has countable-subset closure. This proves existence of a set with the required closure before taking any intersection.
To make the least-set argument precise, form the nonempty setIt is a subset of and contains . Its intersection is also closed: a countable subset of is a countable subset of every and therefore belongs to each such . For any set with the prescribed closure, , whence . This is leastness among all such sets, not just among subsets of .
Finally, well-founded induction on shows for every such : when all members of are in , the countable set is a countable subset of , so . Hence , proving that the definition gives precisely
For the cardinal bound, code the entire countable membership ancestry. A code is a triple , where , is a well-founded relation and an extensional relation, and is distinguished. There are at most such codes: and are coded by subsets of countable sets, and a Cantor pairing function with finitely many tags codes the triple as a subset of .
The well-founded recursiondefines its collapse, as in the Mostowski collapse theorem. The range is countable and transitive; thus each decoded belongs to . Conversely, for , choose a bijection and the point with . Set exactly when . Transitivity of makes this relation extensional, and Axiom of foundation makes it well-founded. The recursion then gives , so this code decodes to .
We have a surjection from a set of at most continuum many codes onto . Using the permitted axiom of choice, well-order the codes and assign each its least code; this is an injection. In fact every subset of is hereditarily countable, giving the reverse bound as well:
The axioms hold except Power Set. axiom of extensionality and Axiom of foundation are inherited by this transitive structure. The empty set and belong to it, giving the empty-set axiom and the axiom of infinity. The axiom of pairing follows from countable-subset closure. For , is a countable subset of , giving the Axiom of union. Any subset of is countable and lies in , so the axiom schema of separation holds for all formulas interpreted in .
For the Axiom schema of replacement, let a formula interpreted in assign a unique to each . Relativize that formula to the set and use the ambient Axiom schema of replacement to collect its range. The range is countable and consists of members of , hence belongs to . The same argument, selecting one witness for each member of the countable domain, proves axiom schema of collection. An ambient choice function on a family has a countable graph of ordered pairs of hereditarily countable sets. Each such pair is in , and countable-subset closure puts the graph in , proving the internal axiom of choice.
However, all external subsets of are elements of . An internal power set of would therefore have to be the full external , by transitivity and absoluteness of subset membership. That is uncountable by Cantor's theorem, whereas every member of is countable. Thus the axioms satisfied by hereditarily countable sets areHere the asserted axiom list includes both Axiom schema of replacement and axiom schema of collection; no equivalence relying on Power Set is being silently invoked.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.