Use the covariant Yoneda embedding . An arrow , viewed as an arrow in the opposite category, induces precomposition . Identities and composition are preserved because composition in is associative.
The covariant Yoneda lemma is the bijection
Its inverse sends to . This is a natural transformation: for , functoriality gives . Conversely, naturality of an arbitrary at gives . Evaluation at the identity morphism therefore makes the two constructions inverse. Their formulas also prove naturality in and, contravariantly, in .
Taking identifies natural transformations with . Thus is full and faithful, and reflects isomorphisms; two image objects are isomorphic exactly when the original objects are isomorphic. It also carries existing colimits in to categorical limits of covariant representable functors: maps out of a colimit are exactly compatible families of maps out of its diagram. Equivalently, this embedding preserves existing categorical limits in . The direction matters: the paper uses covariant representables, rather than the more usual contravariant Yoneda embedding.
A representation of a functor is with such that is a bijection for every . These bijections are natural by functoriality. The element is its universal element.
If is another representation, universality gives unique arrows and satisfying and . Consequently , so by injectivity of the representing bijection. Similarly . Therefore is the unique compatible isomorphism. This proves uniqueness of functor representations; uniqueness refers to an isomorphism carrying the specified universal elements to one another, rather than to every isomorphism between the underlying objects.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.