Put and . Telescoping gives
The martingale transform summands are orthogonal in : for an earlier summand, conditioning on the sigma-algebra at the start of the later increment makes the cross expectation zero. Hence
The martingale increments themselves are also orthogonal. Since , their variance sum equals . Therefore
Only discrete martingale orthogonality is used here; no pre-existing quadratic variation calculation is needed.
The defining relation gives . Applying and the bound from part (a),
Thus
uniformly in the dyadic mesh. This controls the approximations to quadratic variation without assuming that their limits already exist.
For , define and . Each is measurable at time , so the summands in the given difference formula are orthogonal martingale transforms. Therefore
Let
Path continuity on the compact interval gives almost surely, and . Since , . Thus, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and part (b),
The last step is the dominated convergence theorem. The bound is uniform in , and the other ordering follows by symmetry. Hence the terminal martingale transforms are Cauchy in .
For every , subtraction of the definitions gives
The difference of the two supplied continuous martingales is a square-integrable martingale on ; for each fixed mesh its finite sums are bounded. For this dyadic quadratic variation of a bounded continuous martingale, the Doob L2 maximal inequality therefore gives
Thus the dyadic approximations to quadratic variation are Cauchy for the expected squared uniform norm, as required. No monotonicity in time of the partially completed squared-increment sums is needed.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.