Let be the total gas energy density, with . The one-dimensional continuity and momentum equations are
Using continuity to put the momentum equation into conservative form gives
The internal energy density satisfies
by the adiabatic pressure equation. Multiplying the momentum equation by and using continuity gives
Adding these equations combines the pressure work into . The conservation law variables and conservation law fluxes are therefore
The three rows express conservation of mass, momentum and total energy. Their integral conservation laws remain meaningful across a shock wave, where the differential pressure and velocity equations cannot be applied pointwise.
Integrating each conservation law across a vanishingly thin interval around the stationary shock wave leaves equal conservation law fluxes on its two sides. Hence
These are the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions for a perfect gas. Signed velocities may both be negative when the material travels from positive to negative ; no sign change is needed in the conservation law fluxes.
Put , and . Momentum conservation gives
Divide the energy condition by the nonzero mass flux. Equality of kinetic energy plus specific enthalpy gives
Substituting and multiplying by yields
The factor is the continuous, no-shock solution. On the nontrivial normal shock wave branch,
An admissible compressive gas shock wave has , so and . The algebraic jump equations alone also allow a reversed expansive discontinuity; the entropy production in a perfect-gas shock excludes that branch. At the nontrivial branch joins the continuous solution.
Let denote the front speed in the stationary upstream frame. In the shock frame, the upstream and downstream velocities are and . Taking in the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions for a perfect gas gives
The downstream laboratory velocity is , which distinguishes the gas speed from the front speed.
For the planar blast-wave energy scaling of a self-similar blast wave, integration of the total energy density over the shocked interval gives the energy per unit area on this side:
The similarity solution makes time-independent; a finite positive explosion energy requires . Conservation of energy therefore gives for the expanding front. Integrating from ,
If denotes the one-sided energy, . If the released energy feeds two symmetric fronts, and . In either convention the requested scaling is . The constant depends on the similarity profiles and the energy convention; energy conservation determines the exponent without solving those profiles. The Strong-shock Rankine-Hugoniot conditions additionally fix and .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.