Write and . The characterization concerns an adjunction with the specified unit and counit of an adjunction and . Its triangle identities for an adjunction areAssume these identities. Define the hom-set mapsNaturality of and makes these maps natural in both objects. Naturality and the triangle identities for an adjunction giveThus they are inverse bijections and define .
Conversely, from the natural hom-set bijections of an adjunction, define and . Naturality gives the same formulas for and above. Applying to and to gives the two triangle identities for an adjunction. Therefore these identities are exactly the compatibility conditions on the specified unit and counit. If the printed equivalence were read as mere existence of some adjunction, independently of the supplied transformations, its only-if direction would be false: on the category of abelian groups, are adjoint, but choosing both transformations to be zero does not satisfy either triangle on a nonzero object.
Put . This is a natural transformation . Only the -triangle is assumed. Naturality gives two useful absorption identities:For the second equality in the last line use naturality of at , and then the assumed -triangle. Naturality of at and of at now givesHence is an idempotent in the functor category: this is the one-triangle adjunction idempotent.
For the splitting of an idempotent morphism, suppose this idempotent morphism splits as natural transformations and , with and . DefineThe first absorption identity givesFor the other triangle, naturality of at and of at givesThus the triangle identities for an adjunction prove .
Conversely, suppose , with unit and counit . The unit has target , as its type requires. DefineThese are natural transformations. Transposition under gives . Independently, naturality of at and the assumed -triangle giveThe transpose of is therefore , the transpose of . Injectivity of the hom-set bijection implies . Naturality of at givesConsequently has a left adjoint if and only if splits. This is the criterion for splitting a one-triangle adjunction idempotent. The argument gives both the explicit splitting and the new unit and counit, without assuming the other triangle for .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.