The Axiom of foundation states that every nonempty set has a member with . The principle of epsilon induction states that a formula satisfying holds for every set .
Assume Axiom of foundation and suppose a progressive formula has a counterexample . In the transitive closure of , use axiom schema of separation to collect the counterexamples into a nonempty set . Foundation supplies having no member in . Since the closure is transitive, every member of satisfies , contradicting progressiveness. Conversely, if a nonempty set had no foundation-minimal member, every would have a member . The formula is then progressive: if every member of lies outside , cannot belong to . Epsilon induction would make empty, a contradiction. This proves equivalence in the presence of the other Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory.
To obtain the cumulative hierarchy, perform epsilon induction on the assertion that belongs to some . If this holds for each member , Axiom schema of replacement collects their least such ordinals into a set. Choose an ordinal above them all. Then and . Thus every set occurs in the hierarchy. Use the rank of a set convention , equivalently the least with .
Use the Kuratowski ordered pair . Its rank of a set is . Every pair in the Cartesian product has finite rank, but those ranks are unbounded in . Therefore .
Represent a function by its graph of Kuratowski ordered pairs. For ,The bound is attained by , which is a cofinal function into . Taking the rank of the set of all such functions adds one at this attained maximum. Thus . The extra successor is essential: unlike the previous product, this set actually contains a member of rank .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.