Use the buyer's utility indifference price: is the cash payment satisfying
Assume the utilities are well-defined, the finite indifference price exists, and the suprema are attained as allowed. Write the common reference value as . For claims , choose optimizers at their indifference prices . Because is a vector space, is admissible. The concavity of gives
The optimized utility decreases with the payment; strict increase of and attainment make the comparison strict whenever a smaller payment is substituted into an attained optimizer. Hence the payment restoring utility is at least . Thus
The sign corresponds to buying the payoff. A seller's price uses a different convention.
Here and . The asset payoff has a centered Laplace distribution. Its moment-generating function is for , and diverges otherwise. Expected constant absolute risk aversion utility for a holding is
To maximize it, minimize the logarithm of the positive factor on . Its derivative is , and its second derivative is strictly positive. It diverges at the endpoints, so the unique critical point is the global optimizer:
At use the continuous limit . The other quadratic root is outside the finite-utility domain.
Let . Aggregate demand is . Unit positive supply requires and . Squaring and excluding gives
This negative price satisfies the unsquared equation and every individual finite-utility constraint. When , there is no finite clearing price. Indeed for every finite negative , with limit as . If this maximum limiting demand is below supply; if equal, demand only approaches one at an infinitely negative price. A formal positive solution obtained by squaring when violates the original demand equation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.