A representation of the one-arrow quiver is an matrix . If , changes of basis put it in the form with an identity block and all other entries zero. Since multiplication by invertible matrices preserves matrix rank,
This describes the orbit for every , including the zero orbit. Its dimension is
Indeed, choosing its -dimensional image contributes parameters in a Grassmannian, and choosing a surjective map from onto that image contributes . This is a rank orbit of a matrix under left-right multiplication.
If , the component maps are invertible and satisfy . Thus they define a quiver representation isomorphism . Conversely, any such isomorphism consists of invertible maps , and its commuting squares rearrange to . Therefore
The base change action on quiver representations consequently identifies its orbits exactly with isomorphism classes at fixed dimension vector of a quiver representation.
Split the sequence as vector spaces at each vertex. In these coordinates, the middle arrow maps have block form
For , change basis by at every vertex. It changes the off-diagonal block to . These arrow matrices depend polynomially on and at give . Thus the split extension as a degeneration shows
We must check that the two orbits are different. If , apply to the original short exact sequence. Exactness makes the kernel of equal to . The assumed isomorphism of the middle representation gives , so this map is surjective. In particular the identity of lifts to , splitting the sequence, a contradiction. Hence the orbits are indeed distinct.
The group is irreducible, so is irreducible. An algebraic-group orbit is locally closed, hence open in its closure; its boundary is a proper closed subset of smaller dimension. The distinct orbit lies in that boundary. Therefore
An acyclic finite quiver has integer vertex weights such that for every arrow ; for example, let be the maximum length of a path ending at . For , act by . Then
Every exponent is positive. The arrow matrices therefore extend polynomially to with all arrows zero, which is the origin of the quiver representation space. The values for lie in , so
This proves that acyclic quiver representations degenerate to zero, also when some vertex spaces are zero.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.