For quota share reinsurance, each claim and therefore its aggregate are retained in the same proportion. For aggregate stop loss reinsurance, the insurer pays the aggregate up to the retention, and the reinsurer pays the excess. Thus the insurer's payouts are
The subscript denotes the positive part. The stop loss contract here applies to the annual aggregate, rather than separately to each claim.
The expected value and variance under quota share reinsurance follow by scaling the exponential distribution:
The retained stop loss moments for an exponential aggregate follow from the payout , its survival function equals for and zero for . The tail integral formula for moments gives, with and ,
Consequently the retained moments are
Matching the two expected values forces , which lies strictly between zero and one. The difference of the variances simplifies to
Indeed has and for . Because , the difference is actually positive. At equal retained expected value, aggregate stop loss reinsurance reduces the variance more than quota share reinsurance.
Write and . Their common expected value is . Expanding about the retention gives the requested variance identity
The stop loss variance minimization principle follows from a pointwise comparison. For , the constraint implies
For , the squared distance of from is zero, so the same squared-distance comparison is immediate. Therefore
Subtracting the same proves optimality of the retained stop loss payout:
Since is bounded, its variance is finite; if , the inequality remains valid with infinite variance on the left. When it is finite, equality requires almost surely, because the pointwise squared-distance inequality is strict whenever the two payouts differ.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.