Let , , , and . The real Kolmogorov criterion for uniform approximation says is best if and only if
Equivalently, no direction has the error's sign strictly at every extremal point. If , the criterion is automatic.
For sufficiency, a point with gives , so cannot improve the norm. For necessity, suppose on . Compactness gives a positive lower bound there and on a neighbourhood of . On that neighbourhood, for sufficiently small positive . Off the neighbourhood, has a strict gap below , and small preserves that gap. Thus has smaller error, a contradiction. This also explains why the criterion involves all active extrema.
Let and , with . The Chebyshev alternation theorem is
If such points exist and a polynomial had at every extremum, its signs at those points would alternate. The intermediate value theorem would give at least distinct zeros, impossible for a nonzero degree-at-most- polynomial. The Kolmogorov criterion for uniform approximation therefore proves sufficiency.
For necessity, let and . They are disjoint compact sets. If one set is empty there is just one sign block. Otherwise their positive separation implies that, reading the extremal set from left to right, its signs form finitely many alternating blocks. If there are fewer than alternating extrema, there are at most blocks. Place one point in each extremum-free gap between consecutive blocks. A scalar multiple of can be chosen to have exactly the sign of on every block. Its degree is at most , and throughout , contradicting the Kolmogorov criterion for uniform approximation. Thus there must be at least alternating extrema. If , the exact polynomial is already best and the equalities with zero error are automatic.
Fix the degree bound . Existence can be proved without a general uniqueness theorem: a minimizing sequence in is uniformly bounded because its distances from are bounded. Values at any fixed distinct points determine its coefficients through an invertible Vandermonde matrix, so those coefficients are bounded. A convergent subsequence supplies a polynomial attaining the minimum.
For uniqueness of best uniform polynomial approximation, suppose and attain the same minimum , and let . The triangle inequality makes another minimizer. If , both polynomials equal , so assume . Put and . At each , the two real errors and lie in and their average equals an endpoint. Hence they are equal there, and .
The set must contain at least points. Otherwise interpolate the values on its at most points by a polynomial . Then on . Continuity gives this positivity on a neighbourhood of , while the error has a strict gap below on the compact complement. A sufficiently small positive multiple of decreases the maximum error, contradicting optimality of . This is an elementary perturbation argument, not an appeal to Haar's theorem.
Thus has at least distinct zeros. A polynomial of degree at most with that many zeros is identically zero. The best uniform polynomial is unique for every fixed degree bound: .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.