We use a blow-up compactness proof of an interior Schauder estimate, with Taylor normalization in elliptic blow-up arguments. Fix and suppose no suitable constant exists. There would be solutions with forcing for which
Choose distinct such that, for ,
Then , , and
In particular . Subtract the quadratic Taylor polynomial of at and rescale:
Its domain exhausts . The normalization gives
Taylor theorem, or integration along line segments from zero, consequently bounds on every fixed ball by constants times , respectively. The Hessian matrices are equicontinuous. The Arzela-Ascoli theorem and a diagonal subsequence therefore give in on compact subsets of .
The rescaled equation is
on each compact set. Thus is harmonic and is smooth. Every entry of its Hessian matrix is harmonic and has a global Hölder seminorm at most . The allowed Liouville lemma for globally Hölder harmonic functions makes each entry constant. Since , all these constants are zero.
On the other hand, is a unit vector and by construction. A further subsequence has ; the local convergence implies , a contradiction. Hence the desired constant exists, and
The global Hölder seminorm on the limiting Hessian matrix, rather than a bound on its magnitude throughout space, is what makes this Liouville argument work.
We prove compactness of zero-boundary Poisson solutions. Here the printed must mean ; otherwise the boundary condition refers to an unspecified set. Use this intended boundary condition throughout. Let . A maximum-principle barrier gives a uniform bound on : with , we have and on . Since ,
The weak maximum principle gives , so .
Standard elliptic regularity on the smooth ball first gives . The global Schauder estimate then gives
Thus the functions and all their derivatives through order two are uniformly bounded and equicontinuous on the closed ball. The Arzela-Ascoli theorem gives a subsequence converging uniformly along with all these derivatives. Integration along line segments identifies the limiting derivatives, so the convergence is in .
It remains to keep the limit in the set, rather than merely proving relative compactness. If in , then the zero boundary values pass to the limit and uniformly. For each pair of distinct points,
Taking suprema gives , while . Hence . The limit belongs to the set, proving sequential compactness in . The fixed positive Hölder exponent supplies the compactness; a bound on the supremum norm of alone would not supply this argument.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.