The two preliminary sequence limit laws follow directly from the triangle inequality. For the sum, choose indices so that and beyond their respective cutoffs. Beyond the larger cutoff,
Thus
For the reciprocal, convergence to nonzero gives eventually. The reverse triangle inequality then gives , and consequently
Choosing the eventual error smaller than both and proves
The nonzero limit gives the denominator a positive lower bound; nonzero individual terms alone would not do so. The assumption ensures the reciprocal sequence is defined even before this eventual bound applies.
Use rationalization of a square-root difference to avoid subtracting two large, nearly equal quantities:
Since and the square root is continuous at , the denominator tends to . The reciprocal limit law established above is applicable because this limit is nonzero. Hence
The limit is one half; rationalization exposes the finite difference hidden by cancellation.
Rationalize the numerator of the summand:
For every we have , and therefore
The harmonic series diverges, so the comparison test for series makes the given positive-term series diverge as well:
For completeness, divergence of the harmonic series follows by grouping the terms with : each such block contributes at least . The same rationalization also shows that times the summand tends to . The summands tend to zero, but their harmonic-size tail prevents convergence.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.