The first condition concerns the domains: their symmetric difference must be a finite set. The original PDF prints this condition and the agreement condition together; the converted TeX omits both. The two existing solution scopes are used here to prove the domain and value parts of the single equivalence relation assertion.
Domain agreement is a reflexive relation because , and a symmetric relation because . For the transitive relation property, membership can differ between and only if it differs between and or between and . Thus
A set union of two finite sets is finite, so the domain condition passes through a chain of related pairs. This is the domain part of equivalence of partial functions modulo finite changes.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.