For a short exact sequence of sheaves with flasque kernel, every section of on an open set lifts to there. Indeed choose a maximal partial lift by the Zorn lemma, using the sheaf gluing axiom on chains. At any point outside its domain choose a local lift. The difference on the overlap is a section of and extends to the new open set by flasqueness; subtract that extension from the new lift and glue. Maximality forces the lift's domain to be the whole open set. Thus taking sections preserves this short exact sequence.
Every injective sheaf is flasque: for , the monomorphism between the extension by zero sheaves and the defining extension property of injectivity make the restriction surjective. Embed into an injective sheaf . The quotient is flasque as well: lift a section of on a smaller open to , extend it in , and project.
The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology now gives , since is surjective, and for gives , since injectives have zero positive-degree derived functors. Repeat the construction for the flasque quotient. After finitely many such shifts any specified positive degree reduces to a vanishing first group. Hence
No separation, compactness or scheme hypothesis is used.
Write , where , and , with on the overlap. Since is a quasi-coherent sheaf, it is associated to a -module on . The preimages under the open inclusion of are , all affine schemes. Thus is an affine morphism and its direct image sheaf is quasi-coherent by direct image of a quasi-coherent sheaf under an affine morphism.
The two-chart cover is an acyclic cover by vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme, so the acyclic cover theorem identifies its Čech cohomology with sheaf cohomology. Its only potentially nontrivial positive-degree differential is
This is surjective because of the second summand. There are no normalized Čech terms in degree two or higher for a two-open cover, so
This is the acyclic direct image from an affine chart of the projective line. The pushforward need not itself be a flasque sheaf; the acyclic affine cover is what justifies this computation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.