For the Volterra operator, the identity requires in addition to the printed hypothesis. The constant function is a counterexample to the unrestricted domain assertion: it is not in . The estimate below is valid for derivatives of every function, and estimates the Moore–Penrose reconstruction when this missing boundary condition holds.
Let . Apply separately to the two halves defining differentiation by one-sided difference quotients:
The two translated intervals cover each point at most twice; this proves the factor six. The shifts act on almost-everywhere equivalence classes, so no undefined pointwise data sampling is involved.
For exact data, write the forward difference as and the backward difference as . If , either differs from by at most . The interval has length one, so this also bounds the approximation error. The triangle inequality proves the error bound for one-sided differentiation:
For and , differentiate the bound . Its derivative vanishes at , and . Consequently, when ,
If , the infimum on the open allowed interval is approached as , rather than attained at an admissible endpoint. If and , the bound decreases throughout the interval and has the same boundary behavior. At zero noise with , its infimum is approached as .
A practical regularization parameter choice independent of is
It satisfies and , hence gives a convergent regularization of an inverse problem on the domain of the Volterra operator inverse. This extends beyond exact data: if with , the differences are local averages of . Extend by zero outside the interval; continuity of translations in makes these averages converge to on both halves. Together with this proves convergence uniformly over the noise ball for every admissible exact datum.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.