For a power law , restoring dimensions gives
Independence of mass density requires . Hence viscous hydrodynamic coarsening has
At small , the capillary and viscous terms are both of order , while the convective inertial term is of order and the acceleration of the leading linear law is zero. Thus the leading force balance is viscous resistance against capillary driving, giving in the signed convention of the preceding part.
Equivalently, the domain-scale Reynolds number is , so inertia is negligible as . “Small” here refers to time compared with within a late-stage hydrodynamic window: it does not extend the model through the microscopic initial stage, where diffusion or interface formation can dominate. An initial-time offset changes the intercept, not this asymptotic growth exponent.
For , the dimensional expression is again . Independence of dynamic viscosity requires , giving inertial hydrodynamic coarsening:
For this law, both inertial terms and the capillary term scale as , whereas the viscous term scales as . It is consequently subleading at large . Direct substitution gives the leading amplitude condition
A growing branch requires the indicated ratio to be positive. The inertial combination must be nonzero: if its leading acceleration and convective contributions cancel, so this particular schematic equation cannot realize the generic inertial-capillary balance with that pure power law. The requested scaling assumes no such geometrical degeneracy. This also shows why the coefficients cannot determine a universal numerical prefactor without a morphology calculation. The relative viscous contribution decays as , consistently with an increasingly large domain-scale Reynolds number.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.