Let be Alice's unknown qubit, and label her half of the shared Bell state by and Bob's by . Alice applies a Controlled-NOT gate from the unknown qubit to , then a Hadamard gate to the unknown qubit. The three-qubit state becomes
Alice measures her two qubits in the computational basis and sends the two classical outcomes to Bob. Bob applies , recovering with certainty. This is quantum teleportation; Alice never needs to know the state.
For the shared GHZ state, Charlie first applies a Hadamard gate to his qubit. Then
Charlie measures in the computational basis. Outcome leaves Alice and Bob with ; outcome leaves , which either party converts to by applying after Charlie reports the outcome. Thus
Quantum no-signalling says that, without communicating a measurement outcome, any local trace-preserving operation performed on subsystem leaves all outcome probabilities for measurements on subsystem unchanged; equivalently, it leaves the reduced density matrix unchanged.
The two Bell states are orthogonal. Applying the inverse Bell-state preparation circuit, namely a Controlled-NOT gate from to followed by a Hadamard gate on , gives
A computational-basis measurement therefore distinguishes them perfectly, so
If only is accessible, however,
Every measurement on consequently has the same outcome distribution under both hypotheses. With equal prior probabilities no information is available, and
the error probability of a random guess.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.