Use the hook criterion in a beta set: for a finite beta set of a partition , each hook length is a difference with , and , and every such difference is a hook length.
A hook length therefore gives a bead and a gap . Along the progressionthe first position is a bead and the last is a gap. Some adjacent positions are consequently a bead followed by a gap. Their difference is , so is a hook length. Similarly the progression from to in steps of gives a hook length . Every position used is nonnegative because it lies between and .
The converse is false. Take , , and the partition of an integer . Its hook lengths, arranged in its Young diagram, areBoth and occur, but does not, even though . Henceis a counterexample with distinct .
Put . The Hook-interval decomposition at a Young-diagram cell is the disjoint unionHere is a proof of the identity using the hook criterion in a beta set. Keep only the cells weakly southeast of , translating that cell to ; this gives the partition of an integerLet and use its beta set of a partition . These numbers are precisely the hook lengths down the original column from , with . The hooks along the first row of are the differences for the gaps . The remaining positions in that interval are the beads , giving exactly the displayed disjoint decomposition. The first-row and first-column hook lengths of agree with those in the original Young-diagram hook.
Because , a leg cell satisfies exactly when . Thus divisibility by identifies the relevant cells of the Young-diagram hook with the multiples of in . There are exactly of those, provingThe count includes the corner cell itself.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.