Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2018 / iii / Paper 345 / 3 / d / Solution

For a horizontal source, $m_x=m_0$ throughout. Far downstream $m_z\gg m_0$, so the kinematic plume fluxes obey the vertical pure plume equations to leading order,Set $q=q_{\ast }{f}_0^{1/3}{\hat{s}}^{5/3}$ and $m_z=m_{\ast }{f}_0^{2/3}{\hat{s}}^{4/3}$ with $\hat{s}=s+s_0$. Matching exponents and coefficients gives $(5/3)q_{\ast }=E\sqrt{m_{\ast }}$ and $(4/3)m_{\ast }^2=q_{\ast }$. Consequentlyand the requested literal mass and density-weighted buoyancy fluxes areto leading order. The radius is $b\sim (6\alpha /5)\hat{s}$ and the axial velocity decreases as ${\hat{s}}^{-1/3}$.

The centreline becomes nearly vertical but retains finite horizontal drift:Since $dz/ds=1-O({\hat{s}}^{-8/3})$, there is a finite positive geometric deficit $D={\lim }_{s\to \infty }(s-z)$, and $z=s-D+o(1)$. The equivalent vertical plume virtual origin is therefore located atFor the horizontal point-source forced plume, the virtual source is downstream and below the actual source. The horizontal turbulent round jet first entrains substantial ambient fluid while rising only a little. Thus at the height where it turns upward it already has a finite radius and volume flux; an equivalent pure plume must have begun rising from below to acquire these. The turning displacement, entrained radius divided by its far-field spreading angle, and virtual vertical depth all scale asAt fixed entrainment coefficient this is simply $O(L_J)$. The arclength origin $s=-s_0$ should not be interpreted as a physical height: the curved near field supplies the additional shift $D$. The numerical constants depend on the chosen top-hat plume model and entrainment coefficient; scaling does not fix them.

The inclined forced plume bends from a cubic near-field trajectory toward a vertical asymptote. Dashed far-field spreading lines extrapolate to the equivalent plume virtual origin; the marked location is obtained from the integral model for this illustration, not a universal numerical prediction.