The Noncommutative Ruzsa triangle inequality says that nonempty finite subsets of a group satisfy
The Ruzsa covering lemma says that if , then some with satisfies
Now let be a symmetric subset of a group, so and . Apply the triangle inequality with the middle set to obtain, for ,
The hypothesis therefore gives . Starting from proves
In particular . Apply the covering lemma to and . There is with such that
The set is symmetric and contains the identity element, so this inclusion is exactly the covering condition showing that
Small doubling alone is insufficient in a noncommutative group. Let be a finite group, let be its free product with an infinite cyclic group, and put
Then is symmetric and , while contains the double coset . Distinct pairs give distinct reduced words , so . Letting proves the small doubling does not control tripling in a noncommutative group phenomenon.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.