Let be the all-ones matrix. Every feasible block matrix in the first formulation has , because its principal submatrix on indices is and is a positive semidefinite matrix. In particular, .
By the Schur complement,
Set . Then , , and on every edge. Conversely, for a feasible in the second formulation, its nonnegative diagonal gives , and has , on edges, and .
Both transformations preserve the objective . Hence the two semidefinite programs defining the complement theta number have the same feasible objective values and the same minimum.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.