For fixed , define the remainders
The hypotheses say and , while subtraction gives
Because ,
For sufficiently close to this denominator is therefore nonzero, and
Thus for every , so is an asymptotic sequence.
Suppose
throughout the punctured neighbourhood, and let be the least index with . Part (i) implies for every . Dividing by and taking therefore gives
a contradiction. Hence every vanishes and are linearly independent.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.