For , the conditional probability is
Hence
Because the form a partition, the law of total probability gives
Substitution proves Bayes theorem in the required form:
Urn has blue balls among balls. Averaging over the uniformly chosen urn,
The probability that both removed balls are blue is
Therefore
The first blue draw makes urns with more blue balls more likely, which explains why the conditional probability exceeds one half.
Events and are independent when
For a possible sum , let be the number of ordered die pairs with sum . Then
If , then ; otherwise it is zero. Independence for a possible sum therefore requires
so . This occurs only for , and then is valid for every . Thus
If impossible sums are admitted as events of probability zero, they are trivially independent as well.
Call the coins in the order given. Coin 1 beats the constant score of coin 2 exactly when it shows a head, so coin 1 wins with probability . Coin 2 beats coin 3 exactly when coin 3 shows a head and scores three, again with probability .
Coin 3 beats coin 1 whenever coin 3 shows a tail, or when coin 3 shows a head and coin 1 shows a tail. Its winning probability is therefore
Thus the preferences form a nontransitive cycle:
The second chooser can always select a coin that has winning probability greater than one half against the first choice. Therefore

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.