Model "lme2" replaces by a random intercept and random PTHK slope:
with a fitted bivariate normal covariance matrix for . This adds a random-slope variance and an intercept-slope covariance.
The likelihood-ratio statistic is
An ordinary chi-squared reference is unreliable because the null random-slope variance is on the boundary and its correlation is unidentified there; the reported correlation of one also signals a nearly singular fit. A valid practical test is a parametric bootstrap: simulate many datasets from fitted "lme1", refit both models by maximum likelihood to each, recompute the likelihood-ratio statistic, and estimate the p-value by the fraction at least . The AIC favors "lme2" slightly, whereas its BIC is larger, so the descriptive criteria do not agree.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.