Let be a complex torus. A Riemann form on a complex torus is a Hermitian form on whose imaginary part
takes integer values on . Equivalently, is an integral alternating form satisfying
for every nonzero . A polarisation of a complex torus is such a positive Riemann form, or equivalently its integral cohomology class. By the Appell–Humbert theorem, it is the first Chern class of an ample holomorphic line bundle. A polarisation is principal when the homomorphism induced by is an isomorphism.
The rank assumption says that is a full lattice in the real vector space underlying . Thus is compact, and the inclusion descends to an injective holomorphic homomorphism . It is therefore a complex subtorus.
Conversely, let be a subtorus. Its differential at the identity identifies the universal cover of with a complex subspace . Lifting to universal covers shows that the period lattice of is precisely . Compactness of makes this a full lattice of rank , so every subtorus has the stated form.
Now let be a polarisation on . Its restriction to is still positive definite, and its imaginary part remains integral on , so it polarises . Define the Hermitian orthogonal complement
Because is spanned over by lattice vectors and is integral on , the real equations for make rational with respect to . Hence is a full lattice in , and is a subtorus. Since , the lattice has finite index in . Consequently the addition map
is an isogeny of complex tori: it is surjective and has finite kernel. Therefore and is finite.
Write a lattice vector as
A one-dimensional subtorus would give two -independent lattice vectors spanning one complex line, so their determinant would vanish. Separating the real and imaginary parts and using the -linear independence of gives
If either or is nonzero, these relations make and rationally proportional, contradicting their lattice independence. Thus . If either or is nonzero, the last two relevant relations again make all four coordinates proportional. Hence , and both vectors lie in . Conversely, and lie in , so
is a one-dimensional subtorus. It is the unique one.
If admitted a polarisation, part (ii) would give a one-dimensional complementary subtorus with . Uniqueness would force , making , a contradiction. Thus is a nonprojective complex torus and has no polarisation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.